A Happy New Year to all our blog readers!
This blog may be the first in a series on the subject of Incident Management – a fundamental part of ITSM. I’m going to start with the basics, and then take it from there.
The first thing I need is a definition, of what an Incident is. ‘Best practice for Service Support’ (pub TSO) very kindly gives us a definition as follows:
any event which is not part of the standard operation of a service and which causes, or may cause, an interruption to, or reduction in, the quality of a service.
Incidents, therefore, cover a multitude of faults, errors and unexpected events users might experience. An Incident can also be taken as a simple user query like ‘how do I do a mail merge?’ or a password reset request.
Having defined Incidents, it’s worth stating the goal of Incident Management: to restore services as quickly as possible to users, thereby reducing the impact of Incidents upon the organisation. This is not to say that is all we do: there are quite a lot more tasks involved, but this is the ‘output’ or primary goal of the Incident Management process (remember that a general goal of IT Service Management is to stop Incident happening in the first place).
The role of the Helpdesk/Service Desk in Incident Management is key – even if specialist teams (such as network operations or database administrators) happen to be assigned to the Incident. This is because the Helpdesk/Service Desk should ‘own’ the total pool of active Incidents, taking action where required to ensure a timely resolution or workaround for the customer. This is why Serio allows you to have both an Assigned Team and Agent, and an Owning Team and Agent for an Incident – so that the actual ownership of this ‘pool’ of unresolved tickets can be split between members of the Helpdesk or Service Desk.
To illustrate this with an example, you might have a Service Desk agent called John who logs an Incident for a database error. John might have to assign this to the specialist Database team for resolution, but still maintain some ownership (distinct from assignment) for the Incident in question. What John actual does with the Incidents he owns will depend upon his companies’ own procedures, but he might:
- Intervene and review the Incident at some point before a resolution time (SLA) breach
- He might manage communication with the customer
- He might be involved with the further escalation of the Incident
I’ll continue to address this subject in later posts.